


   








|
Mar 29, 1999 -- Okay, Women Really
Could Use Special Advice About Investing But why does it have to be so
brainless? Amy Kover
"Close your eyes. Take a moment to remember when you were a child," the
psychologist intones. "What was your first experience with money? Was it a
good experience?"
A group meditation class? A therapy session? No, it's the kickoff of an
investment seminar that Michelle Smith and her mother, Corinne, financial
planners at Paine Webber, organized for about 40 women back in January.
While the Smiths' approach may be unusual, they are far from alone in
targeting investment advice specifically to a female audience. In the past
seven years the number of books, seminars, investing programs, television
shows, and magazines designed to help women "get smart" about money (as
they frequently put it) has exploded. More than 20 investing books
included the word "woman" or "women" in their titles this past year or so,
as opposed to just four in 1992. Worth magazine put out a women's
investing supplement called Equity. (Sample story line: "The history of
women is told through the history of handbags.") Says Deena Katz,
president of Evensky Brown & Katz, a financial-planning firm in Coral
Gables, Fla.: "Everyone is pandering to the women's market these days."
It's really no surprise. Whether it's to sell jeans to black teens or
cruises to homosexuals, segmented marketing is everywhere. And now that
women work and earn more than ever before, the financial industry
naturally wants to tap into those dollars. Moreover, several trends having
to do with women started to coalesce around 1992--Supreme Court Justice
Clarence Thomas' confirmation hearings, the "Year of the Woman" that saw
an unprecedented six women elected to the U.S. Senate, a groundbreaking
survey by Oppenheimer Funds showing that women felt alienated by financial
advisers. "When you have an investing seminar just for women, it allows
their concerns to be the focus," says
Louis "P.J." Patierno, a
financial planner in Colorado.
The problem is that with so much "pandering" --or, at least, segmented
marketing--going on, women's financial materials can range from worthwhile
to offensive. As Melissa Moss, who heads up the Women's Consumer Network,
points out, "Women don't want to be talked down to, nor do they want to
feel ghettoized." But even if the material is superb, do women need a
special approach? "There's nothing in men's genes that makes them better
at investing than women," jokes Alexandra Armstrong, a well-known
Washington, D.C., financial planner. Nor is there any reason women as well
as men can't pick up a basic investment primer. Money is supposed to be
gender-neutral, after all. Microsoft will perform just as well in a
woman's portfolio as in a man's.
But there are demographic differences between men and women that can
affect financial decisions. For one thing, women probably need to be
saving more money. They live an average of about six years longer than
men. At the same time, because of their work history--women tend to hold
service-sector jobs, work for small companies, or drop in and out of the
labor force, all situations that make it difficult to accumulate much of a
retirement nest egg--relatively few qualify for pensions, and those who
do, receive only half as much as men, on average. In the end women wind up
living longer--but with less money to live on.
Despite their need for higher savings, a fear of risk often prevents
women from investing as aggressively as they should. Only 5% of female
decision-makers surveyed by the Investment Company Institute in 1995 were
willing to take substantial risk for the prospect of substantial returns,
compared with 11% of the men. Along the same lines, a study conducted by
Long Island University's National Center for Women and Retirement Research
from 1996 to 1998 showed that among households with income of at least
$30,000, 87% of women owned CDs in their retirement plans, vs. just 52% of
men. Safe but low-growth products like CDs can barely beat inflation, let
alone earn a decent return over time. And Oppenheimer has found that
"advisers assumed that women were more conservative and would sell them
government bonds," says CEO Bridget Macaskill. "What they really should
have been doing was encouraging women to be more aggressive."
Now throw in one more twist: Women's longer life spans, added to the
rising divorce rate, mean that nine out of ten women will wind up in
charge of their family's finances, generally because there's no man
around. Often they are not well equipped to do this: Only 12% of the women
who have partners have sole responsibility for their family's investments,
according to the Oppenheimer survey. The result is a client base with
money and no idea how to invest it.
With statistics like these floating around, special financial planning
for women is a good idea--if it's done right. What are some of the
programs doing wrong? For one thing, they rely on cheesy gimmicks. Helen
Rothlein, a financial adviser at Prudential Securities, links her program
to girls' stuff, holding seminars at Saks Fifth Avenue or Sotheby's.
Similarly, Geri Eisenman Zolna, an adviser at American Express, likes to
schedule female client-appreciation nights at restaurants. "If I were to
market to men, it might be at Madison Square Garden," she says. For a
$2,000 minimum investment, American Express also offers useless freebies
such as a ProcrastiMeter--a little cardboard slide rule-type scale that
allegedly measures your readiness for retirement.
|